<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Aerify?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.golfinnyc.com/blog/2007/03/19/why-aerify/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.golfinnyc.com/blog/2007/03/19/why-aerify/</link>
	<description>Golf In New York City</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 05:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ART ANON</title>
		<link>http://www.golfinnyc.com/blog/2007/03/19/why-aerify/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>ART ANON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 02:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.golfinnyc.com/blog/2007/03/19/why-aerify/#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Yes aerification is necessary but what the article fails to mention is the differences in recovery time between differently maintained golf courses.  Should the greens take months to recover?  Does anyone ever check the course condition afterward or is the memorandum from the maintenance company enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes aerification is necessary but what the article fails to mention is the differences in recovery time between differently maintained golf courses.  Should the greens take months to recover?  Does anyone ever check the course condition afterward or is the memorandum from the maintenance company enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

